Skip to main content

News on the POI Blog (or, It's Alive!)

The reason that there hasn't been any entries on the blog in almost a year (since July of last year, in fact), was due to the fact that yours truly has had a lack of a laptop with which to write it. As much as a blessing that smart phones have been for the last ten years, sadly when it comes to writing things such as blog entries they are, at best, cumbersome. However, I was recently blessed to have been able to get a brand new laptop. Now with this, expect blog entries at a much more rapid clip. I appreciate everyone reading this and look forward to writing frequent updates to the Preconditions of Intelligibility blog. Thank you so much for your support!

Blessings in Christ,

Ray

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evidences in a Presuppositional Worldview

One of the most prevalent misunderstandings of Cornelius Van Til's apologetic methodology has been with his concept of evidences, and their application to apologetics. It has been charged that Van Til's presuppositional approach has no use for evidences whatsoever, and that the methodology is actually fideistic in nature. However, that assertion is simply untrue. Far from being a fideistic retreat, Van Til's apologetic methodology is in fact fine with using evidences, but only so much as they are used correctly. One could go even further and say that it's only in the presuppositional schema can such a concept of "evidence" even have any meaning. At the core of Van Til's approach to evidences is the fact that no fact exists in a vacuum, or as Van Til would call it, a "brute" fact (a fact that does not have an explanation or a meaning) does not exist. Each and every fact must be interpreted according to the worldview of the interpreter. A Chris...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Mere Chance of Frank Turek's "Mere Christianity"

The influential 20th century theologian C.S. Lewis was the author of "Mere Christianity," published in 1952. A transcription of three BBC radio interviews originally published in pamphlet form during World War II,  Lewis sought to smooth over theological differences between denominations by holding to the common fundamentals of the faith, such as the argument from morality, but with a distinctive lack of adherence to the Bible as an authoritative and inerrant revelation from God. Rather, this methodology focuses on philosophical rationality. As a regrettable side effect, a symptom of modern classical apologetics is the notion of the "brute fact" of the resurrection of Jesus from the dead as proof of His claims to Godhood attested by the eyewitness accounts of the Gospels, in a vacuum apart from any Biblical revelation of God's plan in history. Of course, in a Van Tillian metaphysical construct, a concept of a "brute fact" doesn't exist. Accordi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Derrida, Foucault and Van Til

A brief blog entry, but I'd like to take a moment to recommend an excellent lecture series by Christopher Watkin, a professor at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia as well as a Van Tillian presuppositionalist. In this series he interacts with two of the most influential French postmodernist philosophers of the twentieth century, Jacques Derrida and Michael Foucault, and compares their philosophy with the revelational epistemology of Cornelius Van Til. Well worth your time. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/course/derrida-foucault-bible/#course-introduction
Post a Comment
Read more